Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Oscars 2015: Three Ways to Improve the Academy Awards Telecast


(Photo : Reuters)


The 86 th Academy Awards were not particularly loved by critics.


The Hollywood Reporter called the awards show 'a turgid affair, badly directed, poorly produced and featuring an endless string of either tired or wince-inducing moments by [Ellen] DeGeneres, who, by the last 30 or so minutes, seemed to have given up entirely.'


Like Us on Facebook


called the show a 'ho-hum evening, but not an embarrassing one.'


The Awards show has been repeated lambasted throughout the years for being overlong and for featuring hosts that are either trying to hard to entertain (Seth MacFarlane) or simply not interested (James Franco).


What can the Oscars do to recapture the magic that has made the awards show a cultural mainstay? Here are a few suggestions.


1. Get rid of the Superhero & Movie Tributes

Everyone loves 'The Wizard of Oz.' Or at least one would hope that everyone does. But the decision to honor the film in the middle of the ceremony came off as a bit awkward and unnecessary. Why exactly was the Academy honoring the film? That reason was ambiguous at best and ultimately made the presentation unnecessary. That it added a good five to 10 minutes to the telecast did not help matter.


2. Start the Show Earlier 3. Invite Presenters that Actually Want to Be There

But 'The Wizard of Oz' was not the only culprit in slowing down the evening. The Superhero tributes were a big part of that. They add nothing to the evening except to excite the average audience member that is not particularly invested in the awards. It is almost a lousy attempt to appeal to more mainstream audiences. But the question beckons: Does the Academy really think that the mainstream fan is watching the awards show for that one shot of 'Iron Man' or a few seconds of 'Star Wars?' More to the point, why were there three such montages littered throughout the show? Why waste people's time like that? We know that the Oscars want to celebrate movies, but it is unnecessary to start featuring every movie ever made in an attempt to appeal to every possible fan.


Part of the reason that people get fed up with the show is because it ends really late. On the Atlantic Coast, Sunday's telecast ended around 12; people had to go to work the next morning and were likely more turn off the TV at or past 11. Everyone knows that the Awards show is going to be long. According to the Hollywood Reporter, the average show during the past telecast has lasted about three hours and 29 minutes. An 8:30 EST start time would probably end around 12. So why not start the show an hour early? That would ensure a wider audience for a longer duration. People would get to sleep at a timely fashion without worrying about missing out on major award announcements. It might also appease the reporters that are forced to write recaps and analysis peaces at excruciatingly late hours of the night.


It's a night to celebrate the entertainment business and yet it often feels like half of the people the stage have no interest in being there. Harrison Ford is one case in point. He came on looking angry, stumbled over his words and looked completely uninterested. John Travolta embarrassed himself by mispronouncing (or misreading?) Idina Menzel's name; or was that production's mistake? Jim Carey, while trying really hard to be funny, was also not really into it. Maybe it is better to trim some of the fat and limit the number of presenters. It might get repetitive, but it might also open up the opportunity for some interest moments and gags by this small team, especially if the people brought in to do the job are actually excited about doing it.


What else can the Academy do to improve the Oscars in 2015?


© 2014 Latinos Post. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.


Latest Posts


Post a Comment for "Oscars 2015: Three Ways to Improve the Academy Awards Telecast"