Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Voters to decide fate of Alaska oil production tax

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) - Amid a fog of conflicting claims, Alaskans head to the polls Tuesday to decide if the state's old system for taxing oil companies, passed in 2007 after some lawmakers were suspected of bribery, is better than the new system, a tax cut passed last year to try to attract investment from petroleum companies.


FILE - In this Aug. 8, 2014 file photo, Vic Fischer, a leader of the effort to repeal the oil tax system passed by Alaska state lawmakers in 2013, takes part in a sign-waving event on a busy street in Anchorage, Alaska. Alaskans head to the polls Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2014, to decide if the state's old system for taxing oil companies, passed in 2007 after some lawmakers were suspected of bribery, is better than the new system, a tax cut passed last year to try to attract investment from petroleum companies. (AP Photo/Becky Bohrer, File)


Ballot Measure No. 1 asks voters if they want to reject the 2013 law that supporters have dubbed the 'More Alaska Production Act.' Advocated by Gov. Sean Parnell, it replaced the production tax known as 'Alaska's Clear and Equitable Share,' or ACES, that was championed by former Gov. Sarah Palin.


Critics call ACES an investment killer. It gave tax credits for investment but included a progressive surcharge that companies said ate too deeply into profits, discouraging new investment.


Proof of the law's ineffectiveness, according to critics, was evident in the trans-Alaska pipeline: The flow had fallen from 2 million barrels per day in 1988 to 547,866 barrels in 2012.


Referendum advocates contend Parnell could have fine-tuned ACES but instead pushed for the new law, which gives huge tax breaks to profitable petroleum companies at the expense of revenue that could provide money for teachers, law enforcement, construction projects and other needs. ACES' supporters credited the progressive surcharge with capturing oil price spikes, helping to fatten state coffers.


The new law, also known as Senate Bill 21, would have cost the state $8.5 billion in revenue if it had been in place from 2006 to 2013, said state Sen. Bill Wielechowski, D-Anchorage, who has been appearing on debate panels to urge a 'yes' vote on the referendum to repeal it.


Repercussions from the change are already showing up, he said. The Legislature this year approved an operating budget that will require a $1.5 billion dip into savings, he said.


Post a Comment for "Voters to decide fate of Alaska oil production tax"